Keputusan Penuh PRK Tanjung Piai: BN Menang Besar!

Keputusan rasmi Pilihan Raya Kecil (PRK) P165 Tanjung Piai telah diumumkan sebentar tadi.

Calon Barisan Nasional, Wee Jeck Seng dari parti MCA telah memenangi PRK P165 Tanjung Piai dengan majoriti 15,086 undi mengalahkan Hj. Karmaine bin Sardini (Pakatan Harapan), Wendy Subramaniam (GERAKAN), Dr Ang Chuan Lock (BEBAS), Dato’ Dr. Badrulhisham (BERJASA) dan Faridah Aryani Abdul Ghafar (BEBAS).

Peratus keluar mengundi ialah 74,43% dan undi rosak berjumlah 595 semetara 30 kerta undi tidak dikembalikan.

Rencana berkaitan:

BN Menang Besar PRK Tanjung Piai (Laporan Tidak Rasmi)

Sila klik di ini untuk laporan penuh Pilihan Raya Kecil (PRK) P165 Tanjung Piai. 

Menurut laporan tidak rasmi, setakat pukul 8:15pm, BN telah mendapat 23,621 undi sementara PH mendapat 9,498 undi.

Pengiraan undi sedang berjalan.

Rencana berkaitan:

GERAKAN Nak Kacau Daun di Tanjung Piai?

Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia (GERAKAN) telah mengumumkan bahawa mereka akan turut bertanding dalam Pilihan Raya Kecil (PRK) P165 Tanjung Piai yang bakal berlangsung pada 16hb November ini.

Dalam satu kenyataan yang dibuat presidennya, Datuk Dr Dominic Lau pada 12hb Oktober yang lalu, beliau mengatakan bahawa parti tersebut akan menjadi blok ketiga di dalam pertandingan kerusi Parlimen Tanjung Piai.

Ini adalah kali pertama parti GERAKAN bertanding di dalam PRK sejak parti itu kalah semua kerusi yang ditandingnya dalam Pilihan Raya Umum ke-14 (PRU 14) yang lalu.

Kenapakah GERAKAN berminat untuk bertanding di dalam PRK P165 Tanjung Piai sedangkan peluang GERAKAN untuk memenangi PRK ini dilihat amat tipis?

Untuk rekod, P165 Tanjung Piai mempunyai 56-57% pengundi Melayu dan ianya bukanlah merupakan kerusi tradisi bagi parti GERAKAN; malah parti GERAKAN tidak pernah bertanding di kerusi ini.

Oleh itu, apakah parti GERAKAN mempunyai agenda tersirat di sebalik keputusannya untuk meletakkan calon di dalam PRK ini?

Setakat ini saya tidak nampak di manakah kekuatan baharu parti ini untuk menandingai sama ada PPBM atau BN untuk kerusi P165 Tanjung Piai.

Namun, saya percaya segala keputusan parti mestilah bersebab, sama ada ianya semata-mata sekadar satu percubaan untuk mendapatkan kerusi pertama GERAKAN di Parlimen ataupun ianya sebahagian daripada satu ‘grand scheme’ yang lebih besar di sebalik pergeseran terbuka yang berlaku di dalam beberapa parti politik tanah air ketika ini.

Baru-baru ini, Timbalan Presiden GERAKAN, Oh Tong Keong membuat kenyataan bahawa parti GERAKAN akan meletakkan calon muda di bawah umur 40 tahun untuk PRK ini.

“Kami menawarkan alternatif kepada rakyat yang tidak berpuas hati dengan prestasi pemimpin Pakatan Harapan (PH) yang gagal menunaikan janji dalam manifesto PRU-14, selain kegagalan Barisan Nasional (BN) dalam menangani sentimen perkauman,” katanya.

Oh Tong Keong – Berita Harian (GERAKAN tampil calon muda di Tanjung Piai)

Namun ada pemerhati politik yang berpendapat bahawa tindakan parti GERAKAN yang merupakan bekas komponen BN itu adalah untuk memecah undi Barisan Nasional dan seterusnya menolong PPBM memenangi kerusi Parlimen Tanjung Piai.

PRK P165 Tanjung Piai berlangsung ketika kem Ketua Umum Pakatan Harapan, yang juga merupakan Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) menuntut supaya Perdana Menteri menyerahkan jawatan PM kepada Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim selewat-lewatnya pada tahun hadapan.

Perkara ini juga melibatkan tuduh-menuduh di antara kem Presiden PKR dan kem Timbalan Presiden PKR iaitu Menteri Hal Ehwal Ekonomi, Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali sehingga melibatkan berbagai spekulasi lain.

Malah, beberapa bulan yang lalu, beberapa media utama melaporkan bahawa Datuk Dr. Dominic Lau Hoe Chai memperakui bahawa beberapa orang pemimpin PKR yang mewakili Menteri Hal Ehwal Ekonomi menemui beliau untuk berbincang tentang kemungkinan Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali menyertai parti GERAKAN.

Akhbar Sinar Harian pula telah melaporkan kenyataan Naib Presiden GERAKAN, Datuk G Parameswaran dan Setiausaha Agung GERAKAN, Mak Kah Keong mengalu-alukan kedatangan Timbalan Presiden PKR itu sekiranya benar beliau mahu bersama GERAKAN.

Rencana berkaitan:

Gerakan Lebih Sesuai Untuk Azmin Berbanding PPBM? – Satu Analisa

Ramai pemerhati politik meramalkan Menteri Hal Ehwal Ekonomi, Datuk Seri Mohamed Azmin Ali akan meninggalkan parti PKR jika pergeseran beliau dengan Presiden PKR, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim tidak dapat diselesaikan.

Namun, apabila Utusan Online melaporkan beliau dijangka akan menyertai Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia (Gerakan), dalam jangka masa terdekat, ianya telah menjadi satu berita yang menggemparkan kerana selama ini ramai pemerhati menjangkakan beliau akan menyertai parti PPBM yang diterajui oleh Perdana Menteri, Tun Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad.

Dalam laporan yang sama, Utusan Online juga menyebut:

Sumber berkata, setakat ini pemimpin PKR yang mewakili Menteri Hal Ehwal Ekonomi itu masih berbincang dengan pemimpin Gerakan.

Utusan Online (Azmin tinggalkan PKR, sertai Gerakan?)

Isu ini menjadi semakin hangat setelah beberapa media utama melaporkan Presiden Parti Gerakan, Datuk Dr. Dominic Lau Hoe Chai memperakui bahawa beberapa orang pemimpin PKR dan pemimpin NGO telah menemui beliau untuk berbincang tentang perkara tersebut.

Malah Naib Presiden dan Setiausaha Agung Gerakan telah membuat kenyataan mereka seperti yang dilaporkan akhbar Sinar Harian:

Setiausaha Agung Gerakan, Mak Kah Keong berkata, parti itu mengucapkan selamat datang kepada Timbalan Presiden PKR itu sekiranya mahu bersama Gerakan.

Sinar Harian (Gerakan terima Azmin dengan tangan terbuka)

Dan di bawah tajuk yang sama, Sinar Harian juga melaporkan:

Sementara itu, Naib Presiden Gerakan, Datuk G Parameswaran pula berkata, parti itu mampu ‘bangkit semula’ jika benar Mohamed Azmin menyertai parti tersebut.

Sinar Harian (Gerakan terima Azmin dengan tangan terbuka)

Menariknya, pada masa yang sama, pemimpin PKR bertindak menafikan berita ini, malah ada pemimpin PKR yang menegaskan bahawa Azmin tidak akan meninggalkan parti itu.

Bagi saya, hanya masa yang akan mementukan sama ada benar atau tidak berita bahawa Timbalan Presiden PKR itu akan berpindah ke parti lain.

Saya lebih berminat untuk meneliti kenapa parti Gerakan yang dipilih atau antara yang menjadi pilihan, jika laporan ini benar.

Mungkin ada yang mempertikaikan pemilihan ini, namun memandangkan parti Gerakan kini sedang berada dalam keadaan yang sangat lemah setelah kalah semua kerusi yang ditandingi mereka semasa Pilihan Raya Umun yang lalu, saya kira ini adalah satu langkah yang strategik.

Parti Gerakan juga kini bersendirian setelah meninggalkan Barisan Nasional.

Jika Datuk Seri Azmin menyertai parti Gerakan, ianya bukan sahaja dapat memberi nafas baru kepada parti tersebut, tetapi juga menjadikan parti Gerakan lebih besar kerana sudah tentu pengikut setia Timbalan Presiden PKR itu akan turut berpindah bersama-sama beliau.

Dalam keadaan ini, Datuk Seri Azmin berada pada keadaan yang lebih baik untuk mendapatkan kedudukan yang lebih tinggi di dalam parti berbanding jika beliau berpindah ke parti PPBM.

Malah dari segi logik, Datuk Seri Azmin memang memerlukan sebuah parti baru yang konsepnya berbilang kaum, memandangkan terdapat pemimpin bukan Melayu yang dikatakan berada dalam ‘kem Azmin’; maka keadaan akan menjadi agak sukar jika beliau memilih PPBM kerana beliau tentunya memerlukan sokongan mereka untuk melangkah lebih jauh.

Dari sudut yang berbeza, jika Datuk Seri Azmin berjaya membawa ramai pengikutnya berpindah bersama-samanya, ianya berkemungkinan boleh memberi tekanan ke atas dasar, prinsip dan ideologi parti Gerakan; jika kedua-dua pihak mempunyai pandangan politik yang berbeza.

Perkara sebegini harus diberi perhatian oleh remaja seperti saya, memandangkan jika PRU 15 berlangsung selepas tahun 2021, kemungkinannya sebahagian daripada kami akan layak mengundi.

Maka demi #Undi18, remaja mesti lebih fokus akan isu semasa dan menjadi celik politik.


Good Leaders Lead By Example

I do not understand what is the problem with certain politicians of late.

It seems that condemning Islam and questioning the rights of the Malays is now in trend, and so, lots of political leaders jump on the bandwagon as not to be left behind.

Recently, it was the Gerakan vice-president’s turn to make to make such statement, although he later retracted his statement.

According to Gerakan’s Dominic Lau Hoe Chai, “it is religious schools and not vernacular schools that are likely to threaten unity in the country”, as reported by Free Malaysia Today (FMT).

fmt-gerakanFMT wrote, “He also claimed religious schools had the tendency to produce people with a more extremist interpretation of Islam” and Gerakan’s Lau as saying, “The reason we have problems like the unilateral conversion of children in this country is because we’ve moved away from this vision of a secular country”.

Please read and understand the Rukun Negara and the Federal Constitution.

 

Good leaders lead by example.

How could leaders lead a country and want the people to obey the law when they themselves failed to understand and respect the main principals and the supreme law of our country?

My question is, is political gains are more important to these politicians than the unity of the people?

Can they at least try to understand the Social Contract and the history of our country?

Talking about the actions and attitude that threaten that unity in the country, the ill and racist comments by FMT readers on articles about me mostly came from people who hate Islamic Schools and claim that Malaysia is a secular country.

By the way, does the Gerakan man think that Gerakan can win the election without the Malay votes?

Police Report On Lim Guan Eng’s False Statements

whatsapp-image-2016-11-24-at-11-54-16-am

Yesterday, as a loyal citizen of Malaysia, I filed a police report on Lim Guan Eng’s blog article regarding Act 355 at the Ampang Jaya Police Station.

In the article, the Pulau Pinang’s Chief Minister (CM) made four seditious false accusations:

  1. DAP opposes the hudud-like laws because it is contrary to the Federal Constitution.
  2. Our Federal Constitution is secular in nature with Islam as the religion of the Federation. Raising the punishment cap so that it can come closer to Hudud provisions would contravene the Federal Constitution in both spirit and substance.
  3. MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP deserve public condemnation for betraying their principles and promises to uphold and defend the Federal Constitution but also for their political expediency to continue to deceive the people by supporting UMNO that is willing to work together with PAS to bypass the Federal Constitution to allow these laws to take effect.
  4. DAP reiterates that the failure of MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP to leave BN now is seen as a form of tacit approval of the unconstitutional measures adopted by UMNO to support PAS’ move to raise the punishment cap of Islamic laws that moves closer to Hudud-like laws.

DAP opposes the hudud-like laws because it is contrary to the Federal Constitution.

This is a recycled accusation that I’ve answered many times before.

Neither the Act 355 nor the amendment of the Act is contrary to the Federal Constitution of Malaysia and the amendment of Act 355 it is not about implementing hudud-like laws as falsely accused by the CM of Pulau Pinang.

The fact that the Federal Constitution recognises the institution of Syariah Courts as stated in the Article 121 (1A) and the Part 1 List II  of the Ninth Schedule of the Federal Constitution, proves that the Act 355 is not contrary to the Federal Constitution.

Furthermore, the Act 355 is an existing Act and it is already part of the laws of Malaysia.

“Our Federal Constitution is secular in nature with Islam as the religion of the Federation. Raising the punishment cap so that it can come closer to Hudud provisions would contravene the Federal Constitution in both spirit and substance.”

In his above accusation, he made two contradicting statements, saying that the “Federal Constitution is secular in nature” and “with Islam as the religion of the Federation”.

How can our Federal Constitution that states Islam as the religion of the Federation be secular in nature, when George Jacob Holyoake who is the creator of the term secularism, defines secularism as separating government and religion?

In fact, if our Federal Constitution is secular in nature, the Act 355 cannot be part of the laws of Malaysia and the Syariah Courts cannot be part of our judicial systems.

And if our Federal Constitution is secular in nature, the flag of Malaysia must not have any symbol of religion, such as the crescent and star in our flag that represents the religion of Islam.

“MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP deserve public condemnation for betraying their principles and promises to uphold and defend the Federal Constitution but also for their political expediency to continue to deceive the people by supporting UMNO that is willing to work together with PAS to bypass the Federal Constitution to allow these laws to take effect.”

What a defamation and malicious falsehood!

The amendment of Act 355 is not contrary to the Federal Constitution and it is a lie made in bad faith to accuse UMNO as “willing to work together with PAS to bypass the Federal Constitution to allow these laws to take effect”, when everything was done according to the law.

“DAP reiterates that the failure of MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP to leave BN now is seen as a form of tacit approval of the unconstitutional measures adopted by UMNO to support PAS’ move to raise the punishment cap of Islamic laws that moves closer to Hudud-like laws.”

It is clearly said in the Act 355 that the Act only affect the Muslims, so why must the CM who is non-Muslim politicise the issue?

By calling MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP to leave BN, and accusing the two biggest Muslim parties, PAS and UMNO as working together to bypass the Federal Constitution, Lim Guan Eng is trying to create religious and racial tension among the citizens of Malaysia.

Not only that, Lim Guan Eng’s words are against the call made by the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong’s in the parliament on the 7th of March, 2016:

“Beta berharap langkah-langkah ke arah memperkukuhkan institusi agama dan kecekapan perlaksanaan undang-undang pentadbiran agama Islam melalui pemerkasaan Mahkamah Syariah dapat disegerakan.”

Lim Guan Eng has gone against four parts of the Sedition Act 1948, Section 3(1)(a), Section 3(1)(c), Section 3(1)(e), and Section 3(1)(f), an offense which is punishable under Section 4(1) of the Sedition Act 1948.

Section 3(1)(a) of the Sedition Act 1948 states:

Sesuatu “kecenderungan menghasut” ialah kecenderungan—bagi mendatangkan kebencian atau penghinaan atau bagi membangkitkan perasaan tidak setia terhadap mana-mana Raja atau Kerajaan;

The CM of Pulau Pinang’s seditious words which contradict to the call made by the Yang Di Pertuan Agong can be seen as a “seditious tendency” that could “bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against any Ruler or against any Government.”

Section 3(1)(c) of the Sedition Act 1948 says:

Sesuatu “kecenderungan menghasut” ialah kecenderungan—bagi mendatangkan kebencian atau penghinaan atau bagi membangkitkan perasaan tidak setia terhadap pentadbirankeadilan di Malaysia atau di mana-mana Negeri;

Accusing the amendment of Act 355 is a hudud-like law that “would contravene the Federal Constitution in both spirit and substance”, is an insult to the Syariah Courts, hudud law and Islam as well as giving bad impressions to the hudud law and Syariah Courts which could “bring into hatred or contempt or to excite disaffection against the administration of justice in Malaysia or in any State”.

Section 3(1)(e) of the Sedition Act 1948 states:

Sesuatu “kecenderungan menghasut” ialah kecenderungan—bagi mengembangkan perasaan niat jahat dan permusuhan antara kaum atau golongan penduduk yang berlainan di Malaysia; atau

By making statements that:

  • MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP deserve public condemnation for betraying their principles and promises to uphold and defend the Federal Constitution but also for their political expediency to continue to deceive the people by supporting UMNO that is willing to work together with PAS to bypass the Federal Constitution to allow these laws to take effect.
  • Calling MCA, MIC, Gerakan and SUPP to leave BN because of the “unconstitutional measures adopted by UMNO to support PAS’ move”,

Lim Guan Eng is playing a religious and racial games by falsely accusing the Malay Muslim PAS and UMNO “bypass the Federal Constitution” and “taking unconstitutional measures” which could “promote feelings of ill will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Malaysia”.

This will cause the non-Muslims to think that the government and the Muslims are up to something bad and doing things against the law which can cause anger and disharmony among the people of different races and religions.

Section 3(1)(f) of the Sedition Act says:

bagi mempersoalkan apa-apa perkara, hak, taraf, kedudukan, keistimewaan, kedaulatan atau prerogatif yang ditetapkan atau dilindungi oleh peruntukan Bahagian III Perlembagaan Persekutuan atau Perkara 152, 153 atau 181 Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

The Yang Di-Pertuan Agong is the head of religion of Islam of the country and “to question any matter, right, status, position, privilege, sovereignty or prerogative established or protected by the provisions of Part III of the Federal Constitution or Article 152, 153 or 181 of the Federal Constitution is against the Sedition Act.

It is the rights of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong to make decisions on matters concerning the religion of Islam as stated in the Federal Constitution thus making statements against the statement made by the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong regarding this matter is interfering with the rights of the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong.

<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-13316" src="https://ahmadalijetplane.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/whatsapp-image-2016-11-24-at-11-23-30-pm.png" alt=""whatsapp-i

Related Posts:

Teresa Kok’s ONEderful Malaysia: Is Tan Keng Liang A Racist?

DAP’s Teresa Kok’s ONEderful Malaysia Chinese New Year video, was said to be racist and humiliate the Malaysian leaders, the Malays and Sabahans.

A lot of people complained about it and police reports were made against Teresa Kok.

The Star reported that,”Police have opened an investigation paper on Teresa Kok regarding her video clip, which is alleged to contain elements which can cause fear or alarm among the public”.

GERAKAN’s Youth Chief, Tan Keng Liang tweeted this:Tan Keng Liang

Tan2

Since Dap accused UMNO, Utusan and some of the Malay NGOs as racist; I wonder what would they say about this video.

And what will Hannah Yeoh say about Tan Keng Lian’s tweet?

If Tan Keng Lian is a Malay, she can call him a racist; but Tan Keng Liang is Chinese and so are Hannah Yeoh and Teresa Kok.